One video consisted of custom motorcycle builder Jesse James being scrubbed down of all the grease and grime by 3 little people dressed as the All bottles. It was actually not that bad, kinda funny, and they certainly included that look of ameteurism with raw editing, awkward scene cuts, and "nervous" acting. It looked like they were aiming for "viral video."
The other team went in a different direction, aimed for sexual innuendo, and never really got the idea of a viral video nor used the product properly. Essentially they made a joke around parents using "laundry" as a codeword for sex to say around the children. After first denying the husband, played by Clint Black, she comes back later that night revealing a skimpy little lingerie piece. Clint gives us the punchline with "Oh no thanks honey. It was a small load. I took care of it myself." Think about it...Yeah.
Suffice to say, the All executives didn't like either video. They thought the Jesse James video was clever, but not right for their demographic. In the end, neither team won the challenge and two people were sent home. However, I can't put all the blame on the celebrities for making bad videos.
Nobody is going to know All's target market better then All Detergent. But I think the All executives were looking at the wrong medium in order reach that demographic (Young women who happen to have children...not "Moms"). First when you think of viral videos, you think of "Chocolate Rain" or the Numa Numa guy. I don't think moms are going to be flocking online to see Tom Cruise "kill" Oprah.
The other team went in a different direction, aimed for sexual innuendo, and never really got the idea of a viral video nor used the product properly. Essentially they made a joke around parents using "laundry" as a codeword for sex to say around the children. After first denying the husband, played by Clint Black, she comes back later that night revealing a skimpy little lingerie piece. Clint gives us the punchline with "Oh no thanks honey. It was a small load. I took care of it myself." Think about it...Yeah.
Suffice to say, the All executives didn't like either video. They thought the Jesse James video was clever, but not right for their demographic. In the end, neither team won the challenge and two people were sent home. However, I can't put all the blame on the celebrities for making bad videos.
Nobody is going to know All's target market better then All Detergent. But I think the All executives were looking at the wrong medium in order reach that demographic (Young women who happen to have children...not "Moms"). First when you think of viral videos, you think of "Chocolate Rain" or the Numa Numa guy. I don't think moms are going to be flocking online to see Tom Cruise "kill" Oprah.
If they really wanted a viral video, they should have looked at past successes of the Dove Evolution video, Nike's Touch of Gold, or Gatorade's ball girl. These were viral videos done the right way. All's first mistake was asking for significant branding and product placement in the video. People will immediately recognize that a "video" is just a commercial. You can barely see the Gatorade bottle when the ball girl sits down.
What All was aiming for was a clever, cute internet advertising campaign, not viral video. And that's exactly what they got in the end anyways. If you go to their website you'll see two videos from Joan and Melissa Rivers. But they are far from viral. They are just "cute" commercials.
I'm sure not many people are watching the Celebrity Apprentice that much anymore, so I tried to spare you in this post. But what are your thoughts? Do you think All could have reached their target market through viral video?
0 comments:
Post a Comment